ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-label software requirement smells classification using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Software requirement smell detection is an important part of establishing high-quality software specifications. These smells, which frequently indicate difficulties like ambiguity, vagueness, or incompleteness, can lead to misunderstandings and mistakes in the latter phases of software development. Traditionally, identifying requirement smells was a manual process, time-consuming, prone to inconsistency, and human mistakes. Moreover, the previous machine learning and deep learning research was insufficient for detecting multiple smells in a single requirement statement. To address this problem, we developed a multi-label software requirement smell model to detect multiple software requirement smells in a single requirement. Therefore, this study explores a deep learning-based approach to multi-label classification of software requirement smells, incorporating advanced neural network architectures such as LSTM, Bi-LSTM, and GRU with combined word embedding like ELMo and Word2Vec. We collected and prepared an 8120 requirements dataset from different sources categorized into 11 linguistic aspects and we used a binary relevance multi-label classification strategy in which each category was treated independently and used the F1-macro average of each label of the smell. Next, we built models that can classify software requirement smell in a multi-label manner using deep learning algorithms. After executing numerous experiments with different parameters in the Bi-LSTM, LSTM, and GRU models, we obtained 90.3%, 89%, and 88.7% of F1-score macro averages with ELMo, respectively. Therefore, Bi-LSTM achieved a greater F1-score macro average than the other algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.