Observational studyScientific reports2025
Accuracy of blood heparin-binding protein (HBP) for diagnosis bacteremia in patients with sepsis.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinetics and prognostic value of heparin binding protein at the ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Heparin-Binding Protein and Transplant-Associated Inflammation: Emerging Roles in Infection, Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury, and Allograft Dysfunction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation on the significance of miR-199a-5p for preterm premature rupture of membranes with chorioamnionitis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- The influence of early serum heparin-binding protein (HBP) levels on the occurrence of sepsis in patients with severe burns.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Heparin-binding protein as an emerging host-response biomarker for periprosthetic joint infection: a narrative review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Recent advances in biomarkers for detection and diagnosis of sepsis and organ dysfunction: a comprehensive review.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Heparin-Binding Protein as a novel biomarker for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood heparin-binding protein (HBP) for diagnosing bacteremia in patients with sepsis has not been fully investigated. This study aims to explore the diagnostic value of blood HBP in predicting bacteremia in patients with sepsis compared with procalcitonin (PCT), Interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count (WBC), and neutrophil. In this observational study, we enrolled consecutive 146 patients, who were divided into two groups as the bacteremia group (n = 57) and the control group (n = 89). HBP, PCT, IL-6, CRP, WBC, and neutrophil were measured. The Chi-squared test and Student's t-test were used to compare the baseline characteristics. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to describe the diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers for predicting bacteremia in patients with sepsis. Spearman's correlation was used to analyze associations between the biomarkers. The concentration of HBP (204.13 ± 87.30 ng/mL ) in the bacteremia group was significantly higher than that in the control group (81.43 ± 61.53). HBP achieved the largest AUC for predicting bacteremia, with a value of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.94 ). This value was higher than those of the other biomarkers: 0.78 (95% CI 0.69-0.86) for PCT, 0.59 (95% CI 0.48-0.70) for IL-6, 0.56 (95% CI 0.45-0.67) for WBC, 0.73 (95% CI 0.64-0.83) for CRP, and 0.64 (95% CI 0.53-0.74) for neutrophil. The best cut-off value of blood HBP for identifying bacteremia was 95.69 ng/mL, with a sensitivity of 88.64%, a specificity of 68.06%, a positive predictive value of 64.1%, and a negative predictive value of 89.71%. A significant association was found between HBP and CRP (Spearman's rho = 0.528, p < 0.01). However, the correlations among PCT, IL-6, WBC, and neutrophil (Spearman's rho < 0.5, p < 0.01) were relatively weak. Blood HBP may be a useful auxiliary diagnostic marker that is preferable over PCT, IL-6, CRP, WBC, and neutrophil in identifying bacteremia in patients with sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.