ArticleScientific reports2025
Stress management with HRV following AI, semantic ontology, genetic algorithm and tree explainer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A roadmap for artificial intelligence in pain medicine: current status, opportunities, and requirements.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2025Review
- Heart Rate Variability Analysis in Congestive Heart Failure: The Need for Standardized Assessment Protocols.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart Rate Variability (HRV) serves as a vital marker of stress levels, with lower HRV indicating higher stress. It measures the variation in the time between heartbeats and offers insights into health. Artificial intelligence (AI) research aims to use HRV data for accurate stress level classification, aiding early detection and well-being approaches. This study's objective is to create a semantic model of HRV features in a knowledge graph and develop an accurate, reliable, explainable, and ethical AI model for predictive HRV analysis. The SWELL-KW dataset, containing labeled HRV data for stress conditions, is examined. Various techniques like feature selection and dimensionality reduction are explored to improve classification accuracy while minimizing bias. Different machine learning (ML) algorithms, including traditional and ensemble methods, are employed for analyzing both imbalanced and balanced HRV datasets. To address imbalances, various data formats and oversampling techniques such as SMOTE and ADASYN are experimented with. Additionally, a Tree-Explainer, specifically SHAP, is used to interpret and explain the models' classifications. The combination of genetic algorithm-based feature selection and classification using a Random Forest Classifier yields effective results for both imbalanced and balanced datasets, especially in analyzing non-linear HRV features. These optimized features play a crucial role in developing a stress management system within a Semantic framework. Introducing domain ontology enhances data representation and knowledge acquisition. The consistency and reliability of the Ontology model are assessed using Hermit reasoners, with reasoning time as a performance measure. HRV serves as a significant indicator of stress, offering insights into its correlation with mental well-being. While HRV is non-invasive, its interpretation must integrate other stress assessments for a holistic understanding of an individual's stress response. Monitoring HRV can help evaluate stress management strategies and interventions, aiding individuals in maintaining well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.