Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962011›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

Mullerian anomalies: revisiting imaging and classification.

Rashmi Dixit, Chitty Suvarna Duggireddy, Gaurav Shanker Pradhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rashmi DixitDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Chitty Suvarna DuggireddyDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India. duggireddychittysuvarna@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2082-7223
Gaurav Shanker PradhanDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mullerian duct anomalies (MDA) are a group of uncommon but treatable causes of infertility and pregnancy complications. This review describes the embryology, American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification 2021, and corresponding imaging features of MDA. The three phases of embryological development of Mullerian duct structures are described. The main emphasis is on the ASRM 2021 classification of MDA into nine descriptive categories, while the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the European Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ESHRE/ESGE) classification is also briefly described where necessary. MRI imaging features of MDA along with the acquisition techniques are discussed in detail, as MRI is the ideal imaging modality for MDA diagnosis. In addition, the current role of imaging modalities such as hysterosalpingography and ultrasound including 3D transvaginal ultrasound is also elucidated. The review aims to revisit the MRI imaging features of Mullerian anomalies and reiterates that an accurate description of each anomaly and precise communication with clinicians is the priority rather than rigidly fitting the anomaly into one particular category. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The ASRM 2021 classification of Mullerian anomalies has re-defined the criteria for an arcuate uterus. Radiologists must know of the new classification and imaging features and try to describe each anomaly accurately rather than forcefully fitting an anomaly into a definite category. KEY POINTS: MDA has an important role in infertility and pregnancy complications. Knowledge of imaging features helps radiologists aid patient management; MRI is the preferred imaging modality for MDAs. An accurate MRI-based description of Mullerian anomalies is crucial, avoiding the pitfalls of rigid categorization.

Indexed as

EmbryologyInfertilityMagnetic resonance imagingMullerian duct anomaliesReproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID39962011
PMCPMC11832971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.