ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Assessing the perceived impact of ESOR training programs on radiologists' professional development.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cascade mentoring: a proposal for transforming radiology education in line with the European training curriculum.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluates the perceived impact of European School of Radiology (ESOR) training programs on radiologists' professional development.
methodsA cross-sectional survey targeted alumni who participated in ESOR fellowships from 2011 to 2023. The survey included questions on demographics, professional background, ESOR program details, and career impact. Data were collected via a web-based questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
resultsA total of 916 alumni were invited to the survey, with a response rate of 21% (190 participants). The median age was 31 years (range 29-33), and 54% were female. Most worked in public healthcare (62%) and were involved in academic activities (24%). Fellowship types included the visiting scholarship program (44%), Bracco fellowship (32%), and exchange program for fellowships (25%). The majority (59%) reported the fellowship helped them reach their current position, and 35% noted it upgraded their CV. Significant application of learned skills was reported by 69%. Ongoing cooperation with former tutors was maintained by 54%. Financial support was crucial, with 41% stating they could not have completed the training without it, 33% considering it very important, and 13% important. Participants rated the impact on clinical skills with a median score of 9/10. Other areas of impact included research skills (median 7/10), subspecialization (median 9/10), exposure to diverse practices (median 9/10), networking (median 10/10), and personal and professional growth (median 10/10).
conclusionESOR training programs significantly enhance radiologists' professional development through comprehensive support, high-quality training, and substantial financial aid, ensuring participants are well-equipped for career advancement. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study evaluates the perceived impact of ESOR training programs on radiologists' professional development, highlighting significant enhancements in clinical skills, career advancement, and the critical role of financial support in facilitating access to high-quality education. KEY POINTS: The ESOR offers various programs addressing both foundational and advanced training in radiology. Fifty-nine percent of participants reported that ESOR fellowships helped them achieve their current positions. Participants experienced a median improvement score of 9 out of 10 in clinical skills. Fifty-four percent of participants maintained ongoing cooperation with former tutors post-fellowship. ESOR financial support was perceived as crucial by many participants, ensuring access to high-quality education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.