Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39961831›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2025

Evaluation of circulating glypican 4 as a novel biomarker in disease - A comprehensive review.

A Muendlein, A Leiherer, H Drexel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Circulating Glypican 4 and mortality risk in patients with metastatic breast cancer-results from the DESIREE study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A MuendleinVorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation & Treatment, (VIVIT), Feldkirch, Austria. axel.muendlein@vivit.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-4125
A LeihererVorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation & Treatment, (VIVIT), Feldkirch, Austria.
H DrexelVorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation & Treatment, (VIVIT), Feldkirch, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glypican 4 (GPC4), a member of the cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan family, plays a crucial role in regulating various cell signaling and developmental processes. Its ability to be released from the cell surface into the bloodstream through shedding makes it a promising blood-based biomarker in health and disease. In this context, circulating GPC4 has been initially proposed as an insulin-sensitizing adipokine being linked with various conditions of insulin resistance. In addition, serum levels of GPC4 can indicate glycocalyx shedding and associated pathophysiological states, such as systemic inflammation. Particularly in a morbid and elderly population, increased GPC4 concentrations may reflect general organ dysfunction and an advanced state of multimorbidity, showing a strong association with the prognosis of severe conditions such as heart failure or advanced cancer. This comprehensive review is the first to summarize the existing scientific knowledge on the role of circulating GPC4 as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker across different pathologic conditions. We also discuss in detail the putative underlying pathophysiological mechanisms behind these findings.

Indexed as

BiomarkersGlypicansAnimalsHumansInflammationNeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkersGlypicansGPC4 protein, humanBiomarkerCancerCardiovascular diseaseGlycocalyxGlypican 4Insulin resistanceKidney function

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.