ReviewDysphagia2025
Artificial Intelligence in Videofluoroscopy Swallow Study Analysis: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and Application of a Quantitative Assessment Model for Swallowing Function Based on Cross-task Fusion and Temporal Context Aggregation Module.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence tools for the assessment and management of dysphagia: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Screening and Evaluation of Post-stroke Dysphagia: Insights from Neurology, Artificial Intelligence and Data Science-A Scoping Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Multi-Center Validation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Video Analysis Platform for Automatic Evaluation of Swallowing Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based video analysis for automatically detecting penetration and aspiration in videofluoroscopic swallowing study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing swallowing disorders, or dysphagia. However, the interpretation of VFSS is susceptible to human bias and subjectivity, resulting in significant inter- and intra-patient variability. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potentially valuable tool for physicians. This study reviews state-of-the-art research utilizing AI to analyze VFSS for the assessment of swallowing disorders and to support clinical decision-making. Our comprehensive analysis highlights substantial progress in areas such as pharyngeal phase detection, segmentation and identification of the bolus and hyoid bone, and penetration-aspiration detection. Despite these advancements, an end-to-end automated AI tool for VFSS analysis has yet to be developed. However, there is considerable potential for AI applications in areas like exploring the clinical relevance of segmented or tracked components and expanding the scope to include more upper aerodigestive components in the analysis. Additionally, we discuss the limitations of current research, including the lack of publicly available datasets, the need to address the generalizability of AI models, the integration of cutting-edge AI techniques, and the clinical implications for speech-language pathologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39961823What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.