Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39961823›Full record

ReviewDysphagia2025

Artificial Intelligence in Videofluoroscopy Swallow Study Analysis: A Comprehensive Review.

G Sanjeevi, Uma Gopalakrishnan, Rahul Krishnan Pathinarupothi, K Subramania Iyer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

G SanjeeviCenter for Wireless Networks & Applications (WNA), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, India. sanjeevig1999@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3648-2995
Uma GopalakrishnanCenter for Wireless Networks & Applications (WNA), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, India.
Rahul Krishnan PathinarupothiCenter for Wireless Networks & Applications (WNA), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, India.
K Subramania IyerDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kochi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing swallowing disorders, or dysphagia. However, the interpretation of VFSS is susceptible to human bias and subjectivity, resulting in significant inter- and intra-patient variability. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potentially valuable tool for physicians. This study reviews state-of-the-art research utilizing AI to analyze VFSS for the assessment of swallowing disorders and to support clinical decision-making. Our comprehensive analysis highlights substantial progress in areas such as pharyngeal phase detection, segmentation and identification of the bolus and hyoid bone, and penetration-aspiration detection. Despite these advancements, an end-to-end automated AI tool for VFSS analysis has yet to be developed. However, there is considerable potential for AI applications in areas like exploring the clinical relevance of segmented or tracked components and expanding the scope to include more upper aerodigestive components in the analysis. Additionally, we discuss the limitations of current research, including the lack of publicly available datasets, the need to address the generalizability of AI models, the integration of cutting-edge AI techniques, and the clinical implications for speech-language pathologists.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCineradiographyDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersFluoroscopyHumansPharynxVideo RecordingAirway invasionArtificial intelligenceDysphagiaSegmentationSwallowing phase

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.