ReviewPediatric radiology2025
Technology, connection, and engagement-achieving a balance for maximal value hybrid conferences in radiology.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed a transformation in medical education, leading to the emergence of hybrid learning formats that combine in-person and remote participation. While this format offers increased flexibility and accessibility, it presents unique challenges for both educators and learners in radiology training programs.
methodsThis review examines the critical elements necessary for successful hybrid resident and fellow conferences in radiology education, focusing on three key domains: technology, connection, and engagement.
resultsTechnical considerations, including appropriate audiovisual setup and the designation of conference moderators, are crucial for seamless integration of remote participants. Digital tools such as audience response systems, web-based DICOM viewers, and collaborative platforms can enhance interactivity and simulate clinical practice effectively in the hybrid format. Creating an effective learning environment requires careful attention to establishing expectations, maintaining psychological safety, and ensuring equal participation between in-person and remote attendees. Active learning strategies, such as case-based discussions, buzz groups, and peer instruction, can be adapted to include both remote and in-person learners effectively.
conclusionWhile the flexibility of hybrid education offers advantages for work-life balance and accessibility, maintaining educational quality requires thoughtful implementation of these strategies. As hybrid conferences become a permanent fixture in radiology education, programs must address these challenges to optimize the learning experience for all participants while preserving the essential elements of traditional radiology training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.