ArticleAnatomy & cell biology2025
Morphological analysis of occipital condyle and superior articular facet of first cervical vertebra and its congruence in a Thai population.
Article in Anatomy & cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The atlantooccipital joint, which involves the articulation between the occipital condyles (OC) at the base of the skull and the superior articular facet of the first cervical vertebra (C1), is considered a moderately reliable joint for congruence analysis. Evaluating the congruence of OC and C1 in terms of shape and measurement is critical for re-associating disarticulated cranial and postcranial elements in cases of commingled human remains. This study examined the morphological characteristics and congruence between OC and C1 in a Thai population. A total of 201 OC and C1 samples, including male and female specimens, were analyzed to classify their shapes and measurements. The most common OC shape was oval, while the C1 superior articular facet was predominantly eight-shaped. Males exhibited significantly larger OC and C1 measurements across all variables compared to females. Discriminant analysis showed an accuracy rate of 58.2%-70.1% for sex classification. Pearson's correlation coefficients for OC and C1 measurements ranged from 0.490 to 0.818, with the highest correlation observed for the maximum breadth of OC and C1. Sex-specific analysis revealed that males had the highest correlation for maximum breadth, while females showed the highest correlation for minimum breadth. The regression equation for predicting the paired size of OC and C1 had an accuracy rate of 39%-54.46%. These findings contribute to understanding craniovertebral morphology and have implications for forensic identification and surgical planning at the craniovertebral junction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.