ArticleBMJ open2025
Mechanisms and attitudes in responsive healthcare for forced migrant communities: a qualitative study of transnational practice.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Between Vulnerability and Deservingness: Social Imaginaries About Migrants Among Primary Health Care Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Facilitating research participation through a research navigator programme: researchers' insights from a project with asylum seekers and refugees.Conflict and health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo understand the opportunities and practices that can support responsive healthcare for forced migrant communities.
designA qualitative study of five transnational case examples of services actively working to improve access and experiences of care for forced migrant communities, which is one strand of the MORRA Study.
settingFive services (Australia, Belgium, UK) providing a range of care (primary care, health advocacy, education and support, holistic health screening, care planning/coordination, transcultural mental healthcare). Delivered through state and not-for-profit structures in initial and contingency accommodation sites, health clinics and community spaces. Data collection took place between July and October 2022.
participants47 participants including forced migrants using or having used one of the five services, service leads, clinical and non-clinical workers (paid and volunteer), interpreters and service partners. Services supported recruitment of a crude representative sample of worker roles and service users/clients. Participants were required to speak one of nine languages for which we had translated study materials.
main outcome measuresExperiences, practices, knowledges, skills and attributes of workers; experiences of forced migrants engaging in services.
resultsServices showed a willingness to innovate and work outside existing practice and organisational structures, including a 'microflexibility' in their interactions with patients, and through the creation of safe spaces that encouraged trust in providers. Other positive behaviours included engaging in intercultural exchange; facilitating the connection of people with their cultural sphere (eg, nationality, language) and a reflexive attitude to the individual and their broader circumstances. Social and political structures can diminish these efforts.
conclusionsEnvironments that enable good health and support forced migrants to live lives of meaning are vital components of responsive care. This requires flexibility and reflexivity in practice, intercultural exchange, humility, and a commitment to communication. A broader range of caring practitioners can, and should, through intentional and interconnected communities of care, contribute to the healthcare of forced migrants. Opening up healthcare systems to include other state actors such as teachers and settlement workers and a range of non-state actors that should include community leaders and peers and private players is a key step in this process. Future work should focus on the health and health service implications of immigration practices; the inclusion of peers in a range of healthcare roles; alliance-building across unlikely collaborators and the embedding of intercultural exchange in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.