Trial reportBMJ global health2025
Targeting malaria in high-risk populations in low endemic regions in northern Namibia: a quasi-experimental controlled trial to reduce malaria in seasonal agricultural workers and cattle herders.
Trial report in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04094727 (Targeting Malaria High-risk Populations With Tailored Intervention Packages), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Targeting Malaria High-risk Populations With Tailored Intervention Packages: A Study to Assess Feasibility and Effectiveness in Northern Namibia
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAgricultural worksites are rarely targeted by malaria control programmes, yet may play a role in maintaining local transmission due to workers' high mobility, low intervention coverage and occupational exposures.
methodsA quasi-experimental controlled intervention study was carried out in farming and cattle herding populations in northern Namibia to evaluate the impact of a targeted malaria intervention package. Eight health facility catchment areas in Zambezi and Ohangwena Regions were randomised to an intervention arm and eligible individuals within worksites in intervention areas received targeted drug administration with artemether-lumefantrine, mop-up indoor residual spraying and long-lasting insecticidal nets, combined with distribution of topical repellent in Zambezi Region. Impact on malaria outcomes and intervention coverage was evaluated over a single transmission season using pre-intervention and post-intervention cross-sectional surveys in a random subset of worksites and community incidence from passively detected cases. Entomological collections and residual efficacy assays on canvas and tarpaulin were conducted.
resultsDelivery of a single intervention round was associated with a reduction in the prevalence of malaria (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5; risk difference (RD) -6.0%, 95% CI -9.4 to -2.8). Coverage of at least one intervention increased (RD 51.6%, 95% CI 44.4 to 58.2) among the target population in intervention compared with control areas. This effect was largely driven by results in Zambezi Region, which also observed a decline in community incidence (-1.29 cases/1000 person-weeks, 95% CI -2.2 to -0.3). Residual efficacy of pirimiphos-methyl (Actellic) on tarpaulin and canvas was high at 24hours but declined to 44.6% at 4 months.
conclusionThe study shows that targeted delivery of malaria interventions to cattle herders and agricultural workers at worksites has potential to impact local transmission. Findings highlight the need for further research on the role of key populations in TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04094727.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.