Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39961634›Full record

ReviewNeurointervention2024

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scoping Review.

JoonNyung Heo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurointervention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

JoonNyung HeoDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing stroke care by enhancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcome prediction. This review examines 505 original studies on AI applications in ischemic stroke, categorized into outcome prediction, stroke risk prediction, diagnosis, etiology prediction, and complication and comorbidity prediction. Outcome prediction, the most explored category, includes studies predicting functional outcomes, mortality, and recurrence, often achieving high accuracy and outperforming traditional methods. Stroke risk prediction models effectively integrate clinical and imaging data, improving assessments of both first-time and recurrent stroke risks. Diagnostic tools, such as automated imaging analysis and lesion segmentation, streamline acute stroke workflows, while AI models for large vessel occlusion detection demonstrate clinical utility. Etiology prediction focuses on identifying causes such as atrial fibrillation or cancer-associated thrombi, using imaging and thrombus analysis. Complication and comorbidity prediction models address stroke-associated pneumonia and acute kidney injury, aiding in risk stratification and resource allocation. While significant advancements have been made, challenges such as limited validation, ethical considerations, and the need for better data collection persist. This review highlights the advancements in AI applications for addressing key challenges in stroke care, demonstrating its potential to enhance precision medicine and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDiagnostic imagingMachine learningOutcome assessment, health careRisk assessmentStroke

Identifiers

PMID39961634
PMCPMC11900286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.