ReviewNeuroImage2025
EEG microstate syntax analysis: A review of methodological challenges and advances.
Review in NeuroImage, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- EEG Microstate Alterations in Eyes-Open and Eyes-Closed Resting States Across the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Quantitative Comparison of Two Methods for Higher-Order EEG Microstate Syntax Analysis.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Atypical Resting-State and Task-Evoked EEG Signatures in Children with Developmental Language Disorder.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exploring the differences in neural oscillation mechanisms before and after sleep deprivation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- EEG microstate reconfiguration across cognitive states in preschool children with developmental language disorder.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Tutorial on using EEG microstates to study moment-to-moment large-scale functional brain network dynamics in neurodevelopment.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Imbalance, compensation, and rigidity in brain functional connectivity and microstates among older adults with cognitive impairment.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Differential resting-state MEG microstate patterns in migraineurs: a cross-sectional study.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Attention-based multi-feature fusion neuromarker for EEG-driven stress classification in learners.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
- EEG microstate responses of migraine patients to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) microstates are "quasi-stable" periods of electrical potential distribution in multichannel EEG derived from peaks in Global Field Power. Transitions between microstates form a temporal sequence that may reflect underlying neural dynamics. Mounting evidence indicates that EEG microstate sequences have long-range, non-Markovian dependencies, suggesting a complex underlying process that drives EEG microstate syntax (i.e., the transitional dynamics between microstates). Despite growing interest in EEG microstate syntax, the field remains fragmented, with inconsistent terminologies used between studies and a lack of defined methodological categories. To advance the understanding of functional significance of microstates and to facilitate methodological comparability and finding replicability across studies, we: i) derive categories of syntax analysis methods, reviewing how each may be utilised most readily; ii) define three "time-modes" for EEG microstate sequence construction; and iii) outline general issues concerning current microstate syntax analysis methods, suggesting that the microstate models derived using these methods are cross-referenced against models of continuous EEG. We advocate for these continuous approaches as they do not assume a winner-takes-all model inherent in the microstate derivation methods and contextualise the relationship between microstate models and EEG data. They may also allow for the development of more robust associative models between microstates and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.