Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39961478›Full record

ArticleMetabolism: clinical and experimental2025

Neuroprotective effect of small extracellular vesicle-mediated targeting of AMPKα2 in cerebral ischemia.

Alberto Ouro, Amanda Rodríguez-Díaz, Tania López-González, Daniel Romaus-Sanjurjo, Ánxela Estévez-Salguero, Ramón Iglesias-Rey, Mariña Rodríguez-Arrizabalaga, Paola Fernández-Sanmartín, Mónica Castro-Mosquera, Manuel Debasa-Mouce and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hypothalamic wars: the last nanodelivery.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  2. Hypothalamic regulation of energy homeostasis: Quo vadis.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Attack of the kinases: JNK signaling in metabolism.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Alberto OuroNeuroAging Group Laboratory (NEURAL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Centro de investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Amanda Rodríguez-DíazDepartment of Physiology, CiMUS, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15782, Spain; CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), 15706, Spain.
Tania López-GonzálezNeuroAging Group Laboratory (NEURAL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Department of Physiology, CiMUS, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15782, Spain; CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), 15706, Spain.
Daniel Romaus-SanjurjoNeuroAging Group Laboratory (NEURAL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Centro de investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Ánxela Estévez-SalgueroDepartment of Physiology, CiMUS, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15782, Spain; CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), 15706, Spain.
Ramón Iglesias-ReyNeuroimaging and Biotechnology Laboratory (NOBEL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Mariña Rodríguez-ArrizabalagaNeuroAging Group Laboratory (NEURAL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Paola Fernández-SanmartínDepartment of Physiology, CiMUS, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15782, Spain.
Mónica Castro-MosqueraNeuroAging Group Laboratory (NEURAL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Manuel Debasa-MouceNeuroAging Group Laboratory (NEURAL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Antía CustodiaNeuroAging Group Laboratory (NEURAL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Centro de investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Marta Aramburu-NúñezNeuroAging Group Laboratory (NEURAL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Centro de investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
María Muñoz-GonzálezNeuroAging Group Laboratory (NEURAL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Centro de investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Molecular Imaging and Pharmacokinetic Modelling Group, CiMUS, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain.
Pablo AguiarCentro de investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain; Molecular Imaging and Pharmacokinetic Modelling Group, CiMUS, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University Hospital Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain.
Ismael González-GarcíaDepartment of Physiology, CiMUS, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15782, Spain; CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), 15706, Spain.
Marc SchneebergerLaboratory of Neurovascular Control of Homeostasis, Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Rubén NogueirasDepartment of Physiology, CiMUS, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15782, Spain; CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), 15706, Spain.
Carlos DiéguezDepartment of Physiology, CiMUS, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15782, Spain; CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), 15706, Spain.
José CastilloNeuroimaging and Biotechnology Laboratory (NOBEL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Tomás SobrinoNeuroAging Group Laboratory (NEURAL), Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory (LINC), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Centro de investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: tomas.sobrino.moreiras@sergas.es.
Miguel LópezDepartment of Physiology, CiMUS, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15782, Spain; CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), 15706, Spain. Electronic address: m.lopez@usc.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsSmoking is a known risk factor for stroke. However, the 'stroke paradox' refers to the observation that stroke patients who smoke often have higher survival rates and better outcomes compared to non-smokers. In this sense, several studies have demonstrated that nicotine (3-[(2S)-1-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl]pyridine) exerts neuroprotective effects. Despite this, the molecular underpinnings of this phenomenon remain unclear. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is known to play a complex and controversial role in ischemic stroke, with recent evidence suggesting that AMPK inhibition has neuroprotective effects in acute ischemic injury. Nicotine has been shown to influence AMPK signaling in the brain, suppressing appetite and promoting brown fat thermogenesis via hypothalamic AMPK inhibition. Therefore, we hypothesized that the neuroprotective effect of nicotine in ischemia is due to its inhibitory action on AMPK. The aim of this study has been to investigate whether i) AMPK is involved in nicotine's neuroprotective effects on cerebral ischemia and ii) small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-mediated genetic inhibition of AMPK could replicate this effect in rodent models.

methodsMale adult mice or rats subjected to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) were compared with Sham and/or untreated controls groups. The stroke-induced lesion was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Nicotine (2 mg/kg/12 h) and the AMPK activator AICAR (500 mg/kg/day) were given subcutaneously upon reperfusion until the end of the follow-up period to tMCAO rats. Control sEVs or sEVs loaded with a plasmid encoding a dominant negative isoform of AMPKα2 (AMPKα2-DN) were administered intravenously twice after reperfusion to tMCAO mice. Molecular pathways were analyzed by western blotting. Bederson and open-field tests were applied to evaluate behavioral parameters.

resultsOur MRI findings indicated that nicotine treatment reduced brain ischemic injury and improved neurological recovery, as demonstrated by Bederson test, through the inhibition of brain AMPK in ischemic rats. The AMPK activator AICAR reversed the effect of nicotine on injury size and neurological improvement, indicating that the neuroprotective action was dependent on AMPK inhibition. In addition, treatment with AMPKα2-DN sEVs reduced brain lesion and improved neurological recovery.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that the regulation of brain AMPK provides an adequate neuroprotective target for cerebral ischemia, and that the sEV-mediated regulation of this kinase could be a potential clinical strategy against ischemic stroke. Further work, involving scalability in sEV production, immunogenicity, safety and efficacy will be demanding to develop effective and secure therapeutic strategies utilizing sEVs in clinical settings against ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

AMP-Activated Protein KinasesBrain IschemiaExtracellular VesiclesNeuroprotective AgentsNicotineAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAMP-Activated Protein KinasesNeuroprotective AgentsNicotinePrkaa2 protein, mouseAMPK inhibitionApoptosisCaspase 3ER stressIschemic strokeNeuroprotectionNicotineSmall extracellular vesiclestMCAO

Identifiers

PMID39961478
PMCPMC12005051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.