ArticleObesity facts2025
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Psychosocial Distress in Adolescents with Obesity Compared to Those with Type 1 Diabetes: Results from the KICK-COVID Study in Germany.
Article in Obesity facts, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychosocial well-being in adolescents with obesity compared to those with type 1 diabetes.
methodsAs part of the German KICK-COVID Study, adolescents aged 12-21 with overweight or obesity from the German/Austrian Adiposity Follow-up Registry (APV) completed well-being, anxiety, and depression questionnaires (WHO-5, GAD-7, PHQ-9) during routine visits amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. By multivariable linear regression models, adjusted for age, gender, and immigration background, the association between psychosocial distress, anthropometrics, and cardiometabolic risk factors was analyzed. Data were compared to those of youth with type 1 diabetes from the German/Austrian Diabetes Follow-up Registry (DPV) and normative values from the general population. Additionally, a mediation analysis examined the impact of loneliness on mental health through media consumption.
resultsFrom June 2021 to September 2023, 235 adolescents from 6 German and 1 Austrian pediatric obesity centers were enrolled. Results were compared to 235 age- and gender-matched participants from the DPV registry (54.04% males; mean age 15.21 ± 1.66 years) and normative values. Youth with type 1 diabetes were more anxious about their health risk, but distress factors were more pronounced in the APV group (p < 0.001). Girls from the APV group showed higher mental distress than boys across all applied questionnaires, but not for age, BMI-SDS, and migration background as predictors. Perception of loneliness correlated with poorer mental health outcomes, but it was not associated to media consumption. Comparisons with normative values revealed significantly higher depression and anxiety scores (p < 0.001) and lower well-being scores in the APV group (p < 0.01).
conclusionsYouth with obesity and diabetes experienced significant psychosocial distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disease-specific differences were observed on the level of single items: Adolescents with type 1 diabetes expressed heightened concern about their health risks, while those with obesity reported lower self-esteem, increased suicidal thoughts, and fluctuating appetite. Female gender appeared to pose an additional risk factor. Media consumption was notably higher in the APV cohort. Healthcare providers should be vigilant regarding psychological comorbidities in youth with chronic conditions, particularly during periods of heightened stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.