ArticleBiomaterials2025
Profiling of the macrophage response to polypropylene mesh burden in vivo.
Article in Biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological Grafts for the Surgical Management of Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Narrative Overview of the Evolution of Biomaterials.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Profiling the T cell response to polypropylene mesh in a non-human primate sacrocolpopexy model.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Macrophage-to-myofibroblast transition (MMT) - An adverse response to polypropylene mesh implanted for pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery in a non-human primate model.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Vaginal Mesh Exposure After Single-Incision vs Full-Length Midurethral Sling Placement: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Proteomic insights into vaginal mesh complications and treatment targets.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Macrophage-to-Myofibroblast Transition (MMT) - an adverse response to polypropylene mesh implanted for pelvic organ prolapse repair surgery in a non-human primate model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Towards predicting implant-induced fibrosis: A standardized network model of macrophage-fibroblast interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgical repair with polypropylene mesh (PPM) offers improved anatomical outcomes compared to reconstruction using native tissue. However, PPM repair is hampered by complications, most commonly pain or mesh exposure, occurring in over 10 % of cases. This maladaptive response is, in part, attributed to the host response to a foreign material. Previous studies have demonstrated that mesh properties, such as weight, pore size, and porosity, influence downstream outcomes. In addition, computational models and in vivo mechanistic studies demonstrate that mesh deforms after tensioning in prolapse surgery resulting in collapsed pores and wrinkles. To further investigate the role of pore collapse in mesh complications, PPM was implanted flat, or in configurations that would deform upon tensioning in a POP repair surgery using a non-human primate model. After twelve weeks, we analyzed mesh-tissue complexes to characterize the overall host response, profile the macrophage response, and observe the influence of macrophages in downstream healing outcomes that may lead to complications. The results confirm that mesh deformations reproduce mesh exposure and thinning of vagina. In the PPM configurations with the greatest deformation, mesh burden was the highest, which resulted in an overall decrease in the number of cells within the implantation site. Among the cells that were present, we observed a predominance of M1 pro-inflammatory macrophages. While flat mesh was associated with an organized cellular response, deformed mesh led to an increasingly disorganized response as mesh burden increased. Nearly half of the responding macrophages expressed markers associated both with M1 and M2 phenotypes concurrently, suggesting the possibility of newly recruited macrophages responding even 12 weeks after implantation and/or a repetitive microinjury in which macrophages are continuously recruited and polarized without resolution of the host response. Biochemically, we observed a predominantly M1 pro-inflammatory signaling environment and decreased collagen content as a response to implanted mesh. This study evidences the importance of PPM mesh properties, which may alter mesh burden upon tensioning and impact downstream healing outcomes and emphasizes the need for devices that maintain their geometry following implantation in POP surgical repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.