ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2025
Skeletal impacts of dual in vivo compressive axial tibial and ulnar loading in mice.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of compressive axial tibial loading for evaluation of bone adaptation and mechanotransduction has become a common technique in recent years. Despite its popularity, it only produces a single experimental limb per animal which can escalate sample sizes depending on study endpoints. We hypothesized the combination of compressive axial tibial and ulnar loading in a single animal would induce bone formation in loaded limbs, providing two experimental limbs per animal thereby reducing the animals required per study by half. Male and female C57BL/6J mice were purchased at 9 and 19 weeks (wks). Based on sex and age they were divided into 4 groups of N = 17. From each group, N = 5 were sacrificed at 10 and 20 wks for strain gauge calibration. At 11 wks and 21 wks, the left ulnae and right tibiae of the remaining animals (N = 12/group) were loaded 3 days/week for 4 weeks. Tibiae of all groups experienced significant increases in architectural properties due to loading in both trabecular and cortical compartments while there were no significant improvements in the ulna. Female tibiae showed improvements in mechanical properties, but these were not observed in the male tibiae where detrimental impacts were observed. In the ulna, females showed limited mechanical changes due to loading. Contrastingly, loading in males at 11 wks led to decreased mechanical properties while at 21 wks no impacts were observed. Overall, reported beneficial impacts of loading in tibiae were observed in architectural properties but were not maintained in the males' mechanical properties. Impacts of ulnar loading on architectural and whole bone mechanical properties that have been reported elsewhere were not observed in any groups. These data suggest when architectural and mechanical properties are end points, combined loading is not optimal for reducing the number of animals required per study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.