Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39961063›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of ambulatory care management

Methodology of a Social Network Survey in Primary Care Practices With Medical Home Attributes.

Justinna Dixon, Eleanor Turi, Madeline Pollifrone, Kyle Featherston, Jianfang Liu, Grant Martsolf, Lusine Poghosyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of ambulatory care management. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Justinna DixonAuthor Affiliations: School of Nursing (Mss Dixon and Pollifrone; Drs Featherston, Liu, and Poghosyan), Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health (Dr Poghosyan), Columbia University, New York City, New York; National Clinician Scholars Program, Perelman School of Medicine (Dr Turi), Center for Mental Health, Perelman School of Medicine (Dr Turi), Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (Dr Turi), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and School of Nursing (Dr Martsolf), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Eleanor Turi
Madeline Pollifrone
Kyle Featherston
Jianfang Liu
Grant Martsolf
Lusine Poghosyan

Funding

Systems Science and Comparative and Cost-Effectiveness Research Training for Nurse Scientists (S2CER2)T32NR014205 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Lusine Poghosyan, Jingjing Shang · 2013 to 2026
$4.2M
The academic-community experience (ACE): A postdoctoral training fellowship in implementation science to promote mental healthT32MH109433 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI David S Mandell · 2017 to 2026
$2.4M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS025937NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH109433NINR NIH HHS T32 NR014205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide an overview of the methods of a social network survey used to collect data in primary care practices on team structures, compositions, and social networks (eg, support, communication).

methodsA cross-sectional sociometric social network survey in 23 primary care practices with medical home attributes in New York and Pennsylvania was conducted. All primary care providers (ie, physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants), clinical staff (eg, registered nurses, social workers, and nutritionists, etc), and administrative staff (eg, practice managers, office assistants, etc) in each practice were eligible to participate in the online survey. All practice members received an online survey asking them to identify who they work with during a typical week. Data were collected about the characteristics of respondent's relationships with each identified team member, perceived team effectiveness, and respondent-level job satisfaction, intent to leave, burnout, and demographics. We calculated the overall response rate and compared it among practices with different practice sizes and respondent roles using chi-square tests and independent samples t-tests.

resultsThe survey yielded an average response rate of 51.8%, with a range between 21.8% and 82.3% across the practices. Three hundred ninety-four primary care providers, 222 clinical staff, and 173 administrative staff responded to the survey. Respondents (n = 792) were more likely to be from smaller practices and be administrative or clinical staff rather than providers.

conclusionThis social network survey of primary care providers and staff used innovative approaches to collect data on team structures beyond traditional methods. Despite declining response rates in healthcare provider surveys, our survey reached high response rates in several practices. Future studies should find ways to engage primary care providers and staff in survey research.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareSocial NetworkingSocial SupportAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedNew YorkPatient Care TeamPennsylvaniaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39961063
PMCPMC12070469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.