ArticlePhysical therapy2025
Metabolic Health Screening in Physical Therapy Private Practice in Australia: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physical activity and lifestyle management after joint replacement surgery (PALMS): A feasibility study.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceNoncommunicable diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Physical therapists working in private practice have an opportunity to embed health screening in their practice to support chronic disease prevention. However, it is not known if it is feasible to conduct health screenings in physical therapist private practice settings.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of physical therapists conducting client health screening with point-of-care testing.
designThis was a feasibility study, comprising of in-depth interviews and descriptive quantitative data.
settingThe health screenings took place in physical therapy private practices in Australia. The 1-to-1 interviews were conducted via phone, video conference, or face-to-face, according to participant preference.
participantsTwo hundred and thirty adult clients participated in a health screen at a physical therapy practice. Follow-up interviews were completed with 20 clients and 8 physical therapists.
interventionsClients had a 30-minute health screen that included collection of self-reported physical activity and dietary intake and physical examination of metabolic risk factors including waist circumference, blood pressure, and point-of-care testing of cholesterol and glucose. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Using interpretative description methods and inductive thematic analysis, themes were identified from the interviews and then mapped deductively onto feasibility domains of acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, and integration.
resultsThree themes were identified. Clients perceived screening as convenient and comfortable; provided important health information; and could be part of usual physical therapy. Physical therapists saw health screening as a valuable add-on service and beneficial for client management but were uncertain about future integration. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Incorporating health screening into private practice physical therapy services is feasible and valued by clients but physical therapists were unsure how they could integrate this into their practice/business. Physical therapists working in private practice need additional training to incorporate health screening into their practice. Concurrently, funding models need to support this by prioritizing investment in health promotion and disease prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.