ArticlePhysical therapy2025
Sitting Together and Reaching to Play Physical Therapy Affects Dyadic Emotional Availability in Children With Neuromotor Delay and Their Families.
Article in Physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Novel Workflow to Estimate Limb Orientation from Wearable Sensors to Monitor Infant Motor Development.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEmotional availability (EA) describes caregiver-child emotional attunement and is critical to fostering adaptive development. Although early physical therapist interventions adopt a family centered approach, the impact of interventions on families is often not quantified. This study compares EA in dyads receiving usual care-early intervention (UC-EI) versus sitting together and reaching to play (START-Play) in addition to UC-EI.
methodsData were drawn from 106 children with neuromotor delay who were 7 to 16 months old at baseline (mean = 10.5 months) and from their caregiver (91% were mothers). The EA Scale, Fourth Edition, was scored from 5-min videotaped interactions collected at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline. Piecewise multilevel modeling controlling for baseline age and motor delay estimated short- and long-term effects between treatment groups. Additionally, within-group change over time was analyzed to understand if groups differed in direction of EA trajectories. Analyses were run aggregated across all participants and stratified by baseline severity of motor delay or caregiver reported education.
resultsWhen comparing EA between groups, there were significant positive short- and long-term effects of START-Play on adult EA (gs > 0.38), sensitivity (gs > 0.26), structuring (gs > 0.43), and nonintrusiveness (gs > 0.36). For dyads with mild or significant motor delay or whose parent reported less than a bachelor's degree at baseline, positive effects of START-Play were observed.
conclusionResults support important clinical implications for the positive effect of START-Play on EA. Similar child-level treatment effects highlight that the key difference between START-Play and UC-EI may lie in the way intervention affects caregivers. START-Play may be more beneficial to dyads with higher versus lower risks to EA. IMPACT: Early physical therapist interventions can have a significant impact on parents, children, and the parent-child relationship. Measuring the effect of these interventions on the relationship is critical to optimizing the delivery of family centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.