Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39960978›Full record

ReviewOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2025

The importance of assessing vision in falls management: A narrative review.

Jignasa Mehta, Aishah Baig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aishah BaigSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceA comprehensive falls assessment should include the assessment of key visual risk factors, namely, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and stereoacuity, to help prevent further falls in older adults. As a minimum, a thorough visual history and uniocular visual acuity assessment would allow appropriate onward referral for intervention. PURPOSE: Falls prevention is a global public health challenge. The etiology of falls is often complex due to multiple interacting risk factors contributing to postural instability in older adults. Despite national recommendations, the assessment of visual function is often overlooked in falls management. This may be due to a lack of clear guidance on key visual functions that need assessing in this patient group, professional roles, and responsibilities. This review gives an overview of visual risk factors for falls in older adults without cognitive impairment. It focuses on visual functions that can be assessed practically using standard clinical procedures. Possible test selection for a falls clinic or inpatient setting is discussed to help inform the implementation of vision assessments in falls management.

methodsLiterature searches were conducted on Web of Science (1898 to current), MEDLINE (1946 to present), and APA PsycInfo (1887 to present) using relevant search terms and Boolean operators related to visual functions and falls. Retrospective and prospective studies including randomized controlled trials, observational, cohort, case-control, and qualitative studies were included.

resultsVisual functions decline with age due to the normal aging process and age-related pathologies. Despite considerable heterogeneity across studies, the evidence supports the association of falls with declines in visual functions, including visual acuity, binocular single vision, and the visual field, but most notably contrast sensitivity and stereopsis. Existing vision screening tools, which assess multiple visual functions, are reviewed in light of their usefulness in falls.

conclusionsWe recommend a vision assessment in the management of falls, which considers visual functions associated with falls, particularly contrast sensitivity and stereopsis. Existing vision screening tools could be adapted or developed for use in falls clinics or the inpatient setting. Eye health professionals should form part of falls multidisciplinary teams or offer training in assessing vision and help to develop intervention pathways for timely management of visual impairment.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsVision DisordersVision TestsVisual AcuityAgedContrast SensitivityHumansRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39960978
PMCPMC11913239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.