ArticleMedicine2025
Detection and classification of glomerular lesions in kidney graft biopsies using 2-stage deep learning approach.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Implications for Solid Organ Transplantation With the Use of Artificial Intelligence From a Bibliometric Perspective.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- Kidney Segmentation of Histopathological Images with Edge-Aware U-Net to Support Medical Diagnosis and Treatment Planning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimizing outcomes of partial nephrectomy in patients with tumors in solitary kidneys: a non-systematic review.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute allograft rejection in patients undergoing renal transplantation is diagnosed through histopathological analysis of renal graft biopsies, which can be used to quantify elementary lesions. However, quantification of elementary lesions requires considerable expertise, time, and effort. Using a 2-stage classification strategy, we sought to examine the effectiveness of deep learning in detecting and classifying glomeruli into 4 groups, namely normal, abnormal, sclerotic, and glomerulitis, as a potential biopsy triage system focused on transplant rejection. We used the U-Net model to build a glomeruli detection model using 137 kidney biopsy slides obtained from 80 kidney transplant patients. The median age of the patients was 52 (19-74) years, with 65% being men and 35% women. MobileNetV2 and VGG16 models were compared using a 2-stage classification strategy. In the first classification step, the models classified glomeruli into sclerotic and nonsclerotic glomeruli. In the second classification step, the nonsclerotic glomeruli from the first step were classified as normal, abnormal, or glomerulitis. The U-Net model achieved satisfactory detection (Dice coefficient = 0.90), and the MobileNetV2 model was the best for the 2 classification steps, with F1 scores of 0.85, 0.91, 0.98, and 0.92 for normal, abnormal, sclerotic, and glomerulitis, respectively. The 2-stage classification strategy identifies sclerotic glomeruli and abnormal glomeruli relative to permeable glomeruli and quantifies glomerulitis with significant accuracy while avoiding bias from abnormal glomeruli that do not have glomerulitis, providing valuable diagnostic information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.