Observational studyMedicine2025
Effect of Xiao's double C nursing model on motor function, daily living activities, and quality of life in stroke patients.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating serum globulin into the ICF framework: a novel multidimensional predictive model for 1-year mRS outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Improving Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment via Cognitive and Motor Dual Task Gait Training: Potential Mechanisms and Clinical Value.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates Xiao double C nursing model's impact on limb function, daily living abilities, and quality of life in stroke patients. This retrospective study involved 160 stroke patients from our hospital, June 2021 to June 2023, divided into control and observation groups after accounting for 10 dropouts. The control group received standard nursing, while the observation group used Xiao double C model. Effects on limb function, daily living abilities, and quality of life were compared. Initially, no significant differences in limb function scores (P > .05) existed between groups. Post-care, the observation group showed significantly higher Fugl-Meyer and Brunnstrom scores than the control group (P < .05). Similarly, while pre-care quality of life scores showed no significant difference, post-care scores for mental vitality, social interaction, and emotional restrictions in the observation group were significantly superior (P < .05). ADL scores and other quality of life aspects also showed significant improvements in the observation group post-care (P < .05). Xiao double C nursing model significantly enhances limb function, quality of life, and daily living abilities in stroke patients, suggesting its efficacy for stroke patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.