ArticleMedicine2025
Mapping the knowledge of omics in myocardial infarction: A scientometric analysis in R Studio, VOSviewer, Citespace, and SciMAT.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research hotspots and trends in robot-assisted surgery in pediatric urology: a bibliometric review based on CiteSpace visual analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many researchers nowadays choose multi-omics techniques for myocardial infarction studies. However, there's yet to be a review article integrating myocardial infarction multi-omics. Hence, this study adopts the popular bibliometrics. Based on its principles, we use software like R Studio, Vosviewer, Citespace, and SciMAT to analyze literature data of myocardial infarction omics research (1991-2022) from Web of Science. By extracting key information and calculating weights, we conduct analyses from 4 aspects: Collaboration Network Analysis, Co-word Analysis, Citing and Cited Journal Analysis, and Co-citation and Clustering Analysis, aiming to understand the field's cooperation, research topic evolution, and knowledge flow. The results show that myocardial infarction omics research is still in its early stage with limited international cooperation. In terms of knowledge flow, there's no significant difference within the discipline, but non-biomedical disciplines have joined, indicating an interdisciplinary integration trend. In the overall research field, genomics remains the main topic with many breakthroughs identifying susceptibility sites. Meanwhile, other omics fields like lipidomics and proteomics are also progressing, clarifying the pathogenesis. The cooperation details in this article enable researchers to connect with others, facilitating their research. The evolution trend of subject terms helps them set goals and directions, quickly grasp the development context, and read relevant literature. Journal analysis offers submission suggestions, and the analysis of research base and frontier provides references for the research's future development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.