ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2025
Application of transcriptomics concentration-response modeling for prioritization of contaminants detected in tributaries of the North American Great Lakes.
Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revolutionizing toxicological risk assessment: integrative advances in new approach methodologies (NAMs) and precision toxicology.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- Comparison of whole transcriptome and targeted RNA sequencing for ecological high-throughput transcriptomics.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As part of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, chemical monitoring and surveillance efforts have detected approximately 330 chemicals in surface water of Great Lakes tributaries. There were 140 chemicals for which no empirical toxicity data were available. The aim of this study was to generate transcriptomic points of departure (tPODs) for 10 of these compounds and demonstrate how they could be applied in a screening-level prioritization. Organisms representing three trophic levels of the aquatic food web (Pimephales promelas, Daphnia magna, and Raphidocelis subcapitata) were exposed for 24 hr to a half-log dilution series of nominal exposure concentrations typically ranging from 66.7-0.021 µM of each chemical. In addition to observations of apical effects (e.g., survival and morphology), whole body transcriptomic responses (tPODs) to each chemical were evaluated with targeted analysis using TempO-seq for P. promelas and D. magna and nontargeted RNA-seq for R. subcapitata. The tPODs ranged from 0.18-10.8 µM for P. promelas and 0.32-29 µM for D. magna, with the most potent of the chemicals tested being fipronil carboxamide for both species. For R. subcapitata, the tPODs ranged from 0.04-1.77 µM, with gabapentin as the most potent chemical tested. Empirically derived tPODs from these data-poor chemicals were compared with concentrations detected in the Great Lakes basin. Environmental concentrations were less than the tPODs except for R. subcapitata and 3,4-dichlorophenyl isocyanate. Similarly, tPODs from previously tested data-rich chemicals were compared with environmental concentrations, in which case tPODs from several chemicals overlapped environmental concentrations. This work demonstrates the potential utility of emerging ecological high-throughput transcriptomics assays to support screening and prioritization of data-poor environmental contaminants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.