Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39960681›Full record

ReviewJAMA internal medicine2025

Diagnosis and Management of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: A Review.

Yuxin Liu, Anna L Parks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical guidance on evaluation and management of bone fragility in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS): an IOF position statement.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Comprehensive Review of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuxin LiuDivision of Hematologic Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anna L ParksDivision of Hematology & Hematologic Malignancies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Funding

Advancing patient-centered decision making in older adults with venous thromboembolismK76AG083304 · NIA · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Anna L Parks · 2024 to 2026
$729k
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG083304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Nearly 5% of adults have the precursor malignant condition monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS). Management centers on differentiating MGUS from more serious conditions to determine additional diagnostic testing, monitoring, and potential therapy. Observations: MGUS is defined by the absence of end-organ damage or symptoms, a small amount of monoclonal immunoglobulin (M protein), and low volume of plasma cells. MGUS must be distinguished from overt malignant diseases like multiple myeloma (MM), immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, and monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS), all of which cause organ damage or symptoms. Although testing for M proteins is often prompted by clinical findings (eg, osteoporosis or autoimmune disease), recent evidence from screened populations suggests that previous MGUS disease associations were likely overestimated and that testing for M proteins should be reserved for when malignant disease or MGCS is suspected. Risk of progression to malignant disease ranges from 0.5% to 1%, meaning most patients have indolent disease. Guideline-concordant management of MGUS is determined by predicted risk of progression to malignant disease, which depends on subtype of immunoglobulin, M protein concentration, and free light chain ratio. Patients with low-risk MGUS can safely defer bone marrow biopsy and advanced imaging, and should undergo periodic laboratory monitoring. Intermediate- and high-risk MGUS should trigger bone marrow biopsy and bone imaging to detect overt MM and shorter monitoring intervals. Advanced molecular testing may improve on current risk stratification to target monitoring and treatment to those with highest risk of malignant progression and avoid overtreatment of those with low-risk disease. Management will also be informed by results of several clinical trials to clarify the risks and benefits of screening, optimal monitoring strategy, predictors of progression, and potential preventive or curative therapies. Conclusions and Relevance: Evidence-based management of MGUS currently rests on separating clinically indolent from high-risk precursor disease. Research using novel detection methods, incorporating molecular testing into risk stratification, and evaluating screening, monitoring, and therapeutic or lifestyle interventions has the potential to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionHumansMultiple Myeloma

Identifiers

PMID39960681
PMCPMC11975479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.