ArticleGigaScience2025
Dimensionality reduction for visualizing spatially resolved profiling data using SpaSNE.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ClusterGraph: a new tool for visualisation and compression of multidimensional data.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Dimensionality reduction for visualizing spatially resolved profiling data using SpaSNE.GigaScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpatially resolved profiling technologies to quantify transcriptomes, epigenomes, and proteomes have been emerging as groundbreaking methods for comprehensive molecular characterizations. Dimensionality reduction and visualization is an essential step to analyze and interpret spatially resolved profiling data. However, state-of-the-art dimensionality reduction methods for single-cell sequencing data, such as the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP), were not tailored for spatially resolved profiling data.
resultsHere we developed a spatially resolved t-SNE (SpaSNE) method to integrate both spatial and molecular information. We applied it to a variety of public spatially resolved profiling datasets that were generated from 3 experimental platforms and consisted of cells from different diseases, tissues, and cell types. To compare the performances of SpaSNE, t-SNE, and UMAP, we applied them to 4 spatially resolved profiling datasets obtained from 3 distinct experimental platforms (Visium, STARmap, and MERFISH) on both diseased and normal tissues. Comparisons between SpaSNE and these state-of-the-art approaches reveal that SpaSNE achieves more accurate and meaningful visualization that better elucidates the underlying spatial and molecular data structures.
conclusionsThis work demonstrates the broad application of SpaSNE for reliable and robust interpretation of cell types based on both molecular and spatial information, which can set the foundation for many subsequent analysis steps, such as differential gene expression and trajectory or pseudotime analysis on the spatially resolved profiling data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.