ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations presenting as secondary trigeminal neuralgia: a case series.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a potential treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) secondary to arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), though its efficacy and safety remain unclear due to the rarity of this condition. We analyzed 1211 brain AVM cases treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) between 2005 and 2023 at our institution. Four patients (0.33%) were presented with TN secondary to AVM. Three patients received single-fraction GKRS while one underwent hypofractionated treatment. Treatment outcomes were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging, digital subtraction angiography, and the Barrow Neurological Institute pain intensity scale. The mean marginal dose and AVM volume were 21.5 Gy and 0.58 cc, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 85.75 months. Complete AVM obliteration was achieved in all patients, with all experiencing complete pain relief within a mean time of 18 months, enabling gradual discontinuation of medications. No radiation-related adverse effects were observed. Our literature review identified only 15 previously reported cases where SRS was used as primary treatment for TN secondary to AVM, with most cases showing favorable outcomes in pain relief and AVM obliteration. This study is the first case series to demonstrate the sole use and efficacy of GKRS in managing TN secondary to AVM, moving beyond individual case reports. SRS appears to be a safe and effective primary treatment option for TN secondary to AVM, particularly when conventional surgical approaches are contraindicated or pose excessive risks. The sustained pain relief and absence of complications in our series, combined with previous case reports, support its use in managing this rare condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.