SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Gamma knife radiosurgery for patients with jugular foramen schwannomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid frame-mask fixation for Gamma Knife radiosurgery of an extracranial vagal schwannoma: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Article
- Jugular foramen tumor causing isolated hypoglossal nerve palsy: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resection has traditionally been the gold standard for treating jugular foramen schwannomas (JFSs). However, given the high risk of neurological deficits associated with surgical intervention, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a promising alternative. Despite its growing popularity for other brain tumors, there remains a paucity of data on the outcomes of SRS for JFSs. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of SRS as a treatment option for patients with JFSs. We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ≥ 4 JFS patients treated with gamma knife radiosurgery. Comparative analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CI) under a random-effects model was utilized to pool the data. A single-arm meta-analysis evaluated tumor control, neurological deficits, and complications. The analysis included 16 studies with 348 patients and a median follow-up of 33 months. Results demonstrated a 98% (CI: 95 - 100%) rate of tumor control, a 39% (CI: 23-54%) rate of tumor shrinking, and a 19% (CI: 13-26%) rate of neurological deficits. New cranial nerve deficits occurred in 34% of patients (CI: 27-41%). SRS demonstrated a high tumor control rate for jugular foramen schwannomas. However, complications remain significant, with neurological deficits and new cranial nerve deficits post Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). These findings underscore the need for further studies, including comparative analyses between SRS and surgical resection, to better delineate the risk-benefit profile of these treatment modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39960644What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.