Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39960644›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025

Gamma knife radiosurgery for patients with jugular foramen schwannomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Filipe Virgilio Ribeiro, Marcelo Porto Sousa, Lucca B Palavani, Filipi Fim Andreão, Helvécio Neves Feitosa Filho, Leonardo Januário Campos Cardoso, Christian Ken Fukunaga, Murilo Mancilha, Davi Neves Coelho, Yasmin Picanço Silva and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Filipe Virgilio RibeiroBarão de Mauá Faculty of Medicine, R. Ramos de Azevedo, 423 - Jardim Paulista, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, SP, CEP 14090-062, Brazil. filipevirgilioribeiro@gmail.com.
Marcelo Porto SousaFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lucca B PalavaniMax Planck University Center, Indaiatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Filipi Fim AndreãoFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Helvécio Neves Feitosa FilhoFaculty of Medicine, University of Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Leonardo Januário Campos CardosoFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Christian Ken FukunagaFaculty of Medicine, FMABC University Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Murilo MancilhaAnhembi Morumbi University, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Davi Neves CoelhoCEUMA University, Imperatriz, Brazil.
Yasmin Picanço SilvaFaculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Ocílio Ribeiro GonçalvesFederal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.
José Victor Dantas Dos SantosFaculty of Medicine, University Center Estácio of Ceará, Iguatu, CE, Brazil.
Marcio Yuri FerreiraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
Raphael BertaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Allan Dias PolveriniNeurosurgical Oncology Division, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Herika Negri BritoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Arizona, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resection has traditionally been the gold standard for treating jugular foramen schwannomas (JFSs). However, given the high risk of neurological deficits associated with surgical intervention, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a promising alternative. Despite its growing popularity for other brain tumors, there remains a paucity of data on the outcomes of SRS for JFSs. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of SRS as a treatment option for patients with JFSs. We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting ≥ 4 JFS patients treated with gamma knife radiosurgery. Comparative analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CI) under a random-effects model was utilized to pool the data. A single-arm meta-analysis evaluated tumor control, neurological deficits, and complications. The analysis included 16 studies with 348 patients and a median follow-up of 33 months. Results demonstrated a 98% (CI: 95 - 100%) rate of tumor control, a 39% (CI: 23-54%) rate of tumor shrinking, and a 19% (CI: 13-26%) rate of neurological deficits. New cranial nerve deficits occurred in 34% of patients (CI: 27-41%). SRS demonstrated a high tumor control rate for jugular foramen schwannomas. However, complications remain significant, with neurological deficits and new cranial nerve deficits post Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). These findings underscore the need for further studies, including comparative analyses between SRS and surgical resection, to better delineate the risk-benefit profile of these treatment modalities.

Indexed as

Jugular ForaminaNeurilemmomaRadiosurgerySkull Base NeoplasmsHumansTreatment OutcomeGamma knife radiosurgeryJugular foramen schwannomasMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.