ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2025
In silico exploration of natural xanthone derivatives as potential inhibitors of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication and cellular entry.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of molecular interactions of vaping juice components with ACE2 receptor.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A dynamic scapping workflow for RTK domains: computational modeling of natural products as dual modulators of EGFR and VEGFR signaling in breast cancer.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- K36-based inhibitor analogs as potential therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro): a computational investigation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Targeting Acute Myeloid Leukemia with 1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-b]pyridazine derivatives: a molecular docking, dynamics, and ADMET approach.In silico pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has underscored the urgent need for effective antiviral therapies, particularly against vaccine-resistant variants. This study investigates natural xanthone derivatives as potential inhibitors of the ACE2 receptor, a critical entry point for the virus. We computationally evaluated 91 xanthone compounds derived from Swertia chirayita, identifying two promising candidates: 8-O-[β-D-Xylopyranosyl-(1→6)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-1,7-dihydroxy-3-methoxy xanthone (XAN71) and 8-O-[β-D-Xylopyranosyl-(1→6)-β-D-glucopyranosyl]-1-hydroxy-3,7-dimethoxy-xanthone (XAN72). Molecular docking and dynamics simulations (MDDS) were performed to assess their binding energy and stability within the ACE2 active site, comparing them to the reference inhibitor MLN-4067. The top six compounds were selected based on their docking performance, followed by Molecular Mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM/PBSA) calculations to quantify binding affinities. Additionally, molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) analysis was conducted to visualize electron density regions relevant to binding interactions. Our results demonstrate that XAN71 and XAN72 exhibit superior binding affinities of -70.97 and - 69.85 kcal/mol, respectively, outperforming MLN-4067 (-61.33 kcal/mol). MD simulations revealed stable interactions with key ACE2 residues, primarily through hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic contacts. The Molecular Electrostatic Potential(MEP) analysis further elucidated critical electron density regions that enhance binding stability. This study establishes XAN71 and XAN72 as viable candidates for ACE2 inhibition, providing a structural basis for their development as natural xanthone-based therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2. These findings highlight the potential of targeting ACE2 with natural compounds to combat COVID-19, particularly in light of emerging viral variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.