ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Characteristics of breeding and performance parameters of the different local types of moscovy duck (cairina moschata) reared in south Benin, West Africa.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Muscovy duck breeding is a critical component of food security and livelihoods in southern Benin, yet knowledge of breeding practices remains limited. This study characterizes Muscovy duck breeding systems across three agroecological zones using a participatory survey of 420 breeders. The survey revealed a male dominance (77.78%) among breeders, with the Fon ethnic group constituting the majority (85.86%). A consistent male bias was observed across zones in ducks exceeding 6 weeks of age. Free-grazing emerged as the dominant breeding system in Zone 5 (100%), while Zone 6 displayed a more diverse approach (free-grazing: 60%, semi-grazing: 30%, confinement: 10%). Zone 8 primarily utilized semi-grazing (56.25%), followed by free-grazing (31.25%) and confinement (12.5%). Housing also varied across zones, with simple shelters dominating in Zones 5 (100%) and 8 (97.92%), while Zone 6 relied more on duck houses (52.5%). Egg laying performance increased significantly with each breeding cycle, with the third cycle yielding the highest number of eggs (15.37). Hatchability exhibited a different pattern, peaking during the second cycle (95.42%) and showing statistically significant variations across cycles (P < 0.05). Plumage color did not influence reproductive performance. Most surveyed farmers across all three zones relied on traditional natural incubation methods, with 85% allowing ducks to incubate their eggs and only 5% using artificial incubation with locally fabricated incubators. Interestingly, plumage color was associated with duckling survival, with black ducklings exhibiting the lowest mortality risk (P < 0.05). Diseases were reported as the leading cause of mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39960555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.