Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39960540›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025

Impact of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on post-operative pain in robotic urological surgery: a systematic review.

Yama Baheer, Lawrence Isherwood, Ross Warner, Jeremy Teoh, Karel Decaestecker, Prokar Dasgupta, Will Tillinghast, George Trutza, Nikhil Vasdev

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yama BaheerHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK. yama.baheer3@nhs.net.
Lawrence IsherwoodHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Ross WarnerHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Jeremy TeohDepartment of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Karel DecaesteckerDepartment of Urology Maria, Middelares General Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Prokar DasguptaFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Will TillinghastConMed Advanced Surgical, Largo, USA.
George TrutzaConMed Advanced Surgical, Largo, USA.
Nikhil VasdevHertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic technology has revolutionised minimally invasive urological surgery, enhancing precision and minimising surgical complications. Recent evidence suggests that utilising lower pneumoperitoneum pressures improves clinical outcomes but the comparative impact on post-operative pain remains uncertain. This systematic review analyses the literature on low-pressure pneumoperitoneum to investigate its impact on pain and recovery following robotic-assisted urological surgeries, including prostatectomy, partial ephrectomy, and cystectomy. Post-operative opioid consumption, total operating time, estimated intra-operative bleeding, and total inpatient stay were investigated as secondary outcomes. PubMed, NHS Knowledge and Library Hub, Cochrane Central databases, and EMBASE were searched between January 2010 and May 2024. Any identified studies were reviewed against eligibility criteria by two independent authors prior to inclusion. The review was written in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Nine studies were included: six focused on prostatectomy, two on partial nephrectomy, and one on cystectomy. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum was found to result in reduced postoperative pain scores, particularly in the immediate recovery period and on postoperative day 1. Despite these improvements, post-operative opioid consumption remained consistent with standard pressures. The surgical workspace was not compromised when pneumoperitoneum pressures were lower. Lowering pneumoperitoneum pressures in robotic-assisted urological surgery appears to reduce immediate postoperative pain scores without increasing overall complications. This has not led to a noticeable reduction in post-operative opioid consumption. The lack of consistent reduction in opioid use and limited high-quality studies highlight the need for further research, particularly for partial nephrectomy and cystectomy.

Indexed as

Pneumoperitoneum, ArtificialPostoperative PainRobotic Surgical ProceduresUrologic Surgical ProceduresAnalgesics, OpioidHumansMalePressureProstatectomyAnalgesics, OpioidCystectomyLow-pressure pneumoperitoneumPartial nephrectomyPost-operative painProstatectomyRobotic-assisted surgerySystematic reviewUrology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.