ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Recurrence patterns in pediatric intracranial ependymal neoplasm: a systematic imaging work-up.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supratentorial ependymoma: a comprehensive review of molecular classification, management strategies, and clinical outcomes (Part II of pediatric ependymomas across compartments).Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Posterior fossa ependymoma: a comprehensive review of molecular classification, management guidelines, and clinical outcomes (Part I of ependymomas across compartments).Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- A brief history of ependymoma.Neuro-oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCurrently, the different types of ependymal neoplasm (EPN) are defined by anatomical localization and genetics. This retrospective multicenter study aimed to analyze the imaging patterns of both local and distant recurrences in supratentorial (ST) and posterior fossa (PF) EPN.
methodsWe exclusively evaluated patients with recurrent EPN. To form the basis for follow-up evaluations the imaging characteristics for ST-EPN and PF-EPN were assessed and compared to each other. Follow-up assessments included the idenTIFFication of local recurrent tumors, leptomeningeal dissemination, secondary intraparenchymal lesions, and extraneural metastases. MR-signal characteristics of local recurrent tumors were compared to the primary tumor.
resultsThe imaging series included 73 patients (median age at diagnosis 4.6 years; 56 PF-EPN). Recurrences were observed at up to five time points, with a total of 145 recurrence events documented. At first recurrence most PF-EPN recurred locally (29/56), while ST-EPN relapsed by intracranial dissemination (9/17). Local recurrent tumor grew fast and differed in up to one-fifth from the primary (13.2% lower T2-signal, 14.6% brighter T1-signal, 19% less contrast-enhancement). Leptomeningeal dissemination in ST-EPN is mainly restricted to intracranial (90.5%) while PF-EPN more frequently present with spinal spread (45.7%). Transient post-radiogenic lesions (n = 2) and secondary malignancies (n = 2) were rare. Extraneural metastases (n = 3) were found mainly near the surgical access.
conclusionRecurrences can occur multiple times in EPN patients, and the recurrence patterns differ between ST-EPN and PF-EPN. Imaging characteristics of local recurrences can differ from the primary tumor which is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.