ArticlePsychological research2025
The spatial coding of responses can depend on the spatial features of action goals.
Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we aimed to explore whether the spatial coding of responses is influenced by the spatial features of the action goal and whether this coding extends beyond the spatial features of the response keys to include the spatial features of the tools used. Therefore, we employed a size-based Simon effect in which participants were presented with either a large or small object, appearing in blue or orange, during each trial. Depending on the color, participants had to press a switch using a stick with either a large or small component. This component was located at either the end of the stick (Experiment 1) or in the middle (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, the size difference between the stick components was larger than in Experiment 1. Importantly, the size of both possible keys was strictly similar. Our findings revealed a consistent pattern across all three experiments. Participants exhibited shorter response times when the size of the stimulus matched the size of the stick component compared to when it did not. These findings suggest that participants code their responses based on the spatial features of the action goal (i.e., size) and that this coding extends beyond the response keys to include features of the tools used. These results contribute to our understanding of action representation and provide insights into the neurocognitive processes associated with tool use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39960527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.