Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39960498›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2025

Covariation of corticospinal excitability and the autonomous nervous system by virtual reality: the roller coaster effect.

Sidney Grosprêtre, Johanna Mathiot, Pauline Eon, Célia Ruffino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sidney GrosprêtreLaboratory C3S, Culture Sport Health and Society, Sport and Performance Department, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, 25000, France. sidney.grospretre@univ-fcomte.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1023-5842
Johanna MathiotLaboratory C3S, Culture Sport Health and Society, Sport and Performance Department, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, 25000, France.
Pauline EonLaboratory C3S, Culture Sport Health and Society, Sport and Performance Department, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, 25000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9306-7129
Célia RuffinoLaboratory C3S, Culture Sport Health and Society, Sport and Performance Department, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, 25000, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8587-3721

Funding

Institut Universitaire de France Institut Universitaire de France
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) is a computer simulation of a three-dimensional environment, often displayed by means of a headset with integrated screens. While VR is known to consistently stimulate the autonomic nervous system, little is known regarding a possible effect on corticospinal excitability, or regarding a potential link between autonomous and voluntary nervous system modulations during VR. Fifteen healthy young participants were enrolled in a single-session experiment. They were seated in a comfortable chair and equipped with a VR headset that displayed a simulated roller coaster ride. Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) and cardiovascular markers (heart rate, heart rate variability) were monitored throughout the experiment. Corticospinal excitability was quantified by measuring the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP), elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation on the cortical representation of the right First Dorsal Interosseous (FDI) muscle. Results showed modulation in skin conductance, according to the phase of the roller coaster. Corticospinal excitability was increased during downhill and decreased during uphill phases, as compared to flat sections. The evolution of MEP/Mmax was concomitant and correlated to the evolution of GSR. No effect was observed on any of the cardiovascular markers. The present study showed that VR can be an efficient stimulus to modulate corticospinal excitability, even in the absence of a motor simulated situation. These data suggest a potential link between voluntary and autonomic nervous system regulation during VR of stressful situations. This study highlights the attractiveness of VR as an efficient stressor for both autonomous and motor systems, in sport training and in rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Autonomic Nervous SystemEvoked Potentials, MotorGalvanic Skin ResponseMotor CortexPyramidal TractsVirtual RealityAdultElectromyographyFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultElectromyographyGalvanic skin responseHeart rateHeart rate variabilityMotor evoked potential

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.