ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2025
The Burden of Revision Arthroplasty: An Ergonomic Analysis of Surgeon Posture in the Operating Room.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Work-Related Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Surgeons Performing Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRevision total joint arthroplasties are physically demanding cases. Recent studies have shown increased cardiovascular stress in surgeons performing revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) compared with primary cases. To our knowledge, no study has compared surgeon ergonomics during these cases. The purpose of this study was to analyze surgeon posture during primary and revision THA and TKA.
methodsWe prospectively evaluated 286 consecutive cases (103 primary TKAs, 95 primary THAs, 57 rTKAs, and 31 rTHAs) performed by three high-volume, fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. Throughout each case, surgeons wore a posture-tracking device to evaluate time spent slouching. The threshold for slouching was set to 30 degrees of flexion from the neutral spinal axis. Demographic and surgical factors were collected. Two-tailed t-tests and multivariate analysis were used to assess differences between groups.
resultsAfter controlling for individual differences in posture, we found an increase in percentage and duration of time spent slouching between rTHA and primary THA cases (58.9% vs. 43.2%, P < 0.001; 65.1 vs. 32.6 minutes, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, patient body mass index and rTHA were found to be an individual contributor to slouching percentage in THAs (P = 0.001). We found increased duration of time spent slouching between rTKA and primary TKA (80.2 vs. 45.7 minutes, P < 0.001); however, percentage time slouching showed no difference (67.1% vs. 58.5%, P = 0.175). Active fellow involvement was an individual contributor to decreased time slouching in both TKA and THA groups (P < 0.001).
conclusionsSurgeons performing revision total joint arthroplasty spend markedly more case time in a slouched posture compared with primary arthroplasty, particularly in patients with a higher body mass index. Awareness of the surgical and patient factors that can affect posture in TKAs and THAs can help arthroplasty surgeons gain more awareness about injury prevention and potentially help prolong their career.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.