ArticlePediatric pulmonology2025
Acceptability of Telehealth Post-Pandemic Among Clinicians Across the United States Caring for People With Cystic Fibrosis.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reporting of Telehealth Implementation in Cystic Fibrosis: Scoping Review Using a Novel Theory-Based Evaluation Lens.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic ushered widespread adoption of telehealth (TH) by cystic fibrosis (CF) centers in the USA. TH was initially described as well-accepted by both clinicians and patients. As we move past the unusual circumstances of the pandemic, the sustainability of TH remains untested. This study sought to test the durability of clinician perceptions of TH post-pandemic.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional, survey study of clinicians at seven US CF centers. We refined a previously disseminated survey initially designed to assess clinician perceptions of TH in 2020. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and current responses were compared to prior results.
resultsClinician perceptions surrounding TH remain high but have changed over time with 75% now endorsing satisfaction (90% in 2020, p = 0.02). The most cited barriers were technology limitations (68%) and limited in-person assessments (66%). We found a significant decrease in concern over missing in-person assessments compared to 2020. Benefits of TH included convenience for patients and families (100%) and reduction in missed days of school or work (100%). In total, 83% of current respondents felt TH should remain part of routine CF care. A majority indicated certain patient characteristics increased their preference to conduct at least one TH visit per year.
conclusionsDespite restoration of full access to in-person care, clinicians caring for pwCF continue to use TH across the surveyed CF centers post-pandemic. Respondents continue to view TH favorably. Further study is needed to understand for which patient and clinical scenarios TH is most appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.