ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025
Geothermal Arsenic Threats to Intensive Groundwater Utilization in an Arid Basin.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Groundwater quality is critical for safe drinking water and irrigation supplies but can be threatened by geogenic toxins that are difficult to predict. In the arid, high desert San Luis Valley (SLV), Colorado, a groundwater basin serves as the primary water supply with observed arsenic concentrations exceeding the maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 μg/L set by the U.S. EPA. However, the sources and processes responsible for As occurrence are unclear. Through a community-engaged sampling effort, we collected 244 groundwater samples and measured major/trace element concentrations. Long-term land subsidence and depth-resolved sediment texture were computed at the same locations. We tested three plausible geochemical processes responsible for As release: (1) overpumping-induced dewatering of As-bearing clays (proxied by land subsidence), (2) pH-promoted desorption as well as reductive dissolution of As(V)/Fe(III) (hydr)oxides, and (3) incursion of higher-As geothermal fluids (proxied by lithium, boron, tungsten, and molybdenum) into groundwater. We find that statistics, statistical/machine learning, and aqueous thermodynamics all agree that geothermal fluid mixing within the aquifer is the main source of dissolved As. Our findings suggest that overpumping draws higher-As thermal fluid from the bottom of the aquifer to pumping depth, leading to increased concentrations of As in drinking/irrigation water supplies at wells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.