Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39960195›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of clinical psychology2025

Relevance of ecological momentary assessment for medication adherence in clinical settings: A precision psychiatry approach.

Valentine Chirokoff, Arnaud Tessier, Fuschia Serre, Maud Dupuy, Marc Auriacombe, Sandra Chanraud, Sylvie Berthoz, Melina Fatseas, David Misdrahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of clinical psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Valentine ChirokoffUniversity of Bordeaux, INCIA CNRS-UMR 5287 Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7671-9941
Arnaud TessierUniversity of Bordeaux, INCIA CNRS-UMR 5287 Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Fuschia SerreUniversity of Bordeaux, CNRS UMR 6033- Sleep, Addiction and Neuropsychiatry (SANPSY), Bordeaux, France.
Maud DupuyUniversity of Bordeaux, INCIA CNRS-UMR 5287 Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Marc AuriacombeUniversity of Bordeaux, CNRS UMR 6033- Sleep, Addiction and Neuropsychiatry (SANPSY), Bordeaux, France.
Sandra ChanraudUniversity of Bordeaux, INCIA CNRS-UMR 5287 Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Sylvie BerthozUniversity of Bordeaux, INCIA CNRS-UMR 5287 Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Melina FatseasUniversity of Bordeaux, INCIA CNRS-UMR 5287 Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
David MisdrahiUniversity of Bordeaux, INCIA CNRS-UMR 5287 Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la RechercheFondation pour la Recherche Médicale
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication non-adherence is a leading cause of treatment failure in psychiatric populations. However, current studies highlight the lack of methodological guidance on medication assessments. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), using smartphone-based evaluations, shows promise for real-time monitoring in everyday settings.

aimsThis study evaluated EMA's effectiveness in assessing medication adherence in patients with schizophrenia, depression, and substance use disorders (SUD), covering various treatment regimens. MATERIALS &

methodsA total of 133 participants (27 with schizophrenia, 20 with depression, 44 with SUDs, and 42 healthy controls) completed EMA via study-provided smartphones five times daily over 1 week. Treatment regimens, categorized by mono vs. polytherapy and single vs. multiple daily doses, were documented. EMA adherence was calculated from the completion rate of the assessments, while medication adherence was assessed daily for patients. Both mean medication adherence and adherence variation over time were analysed by diagnosis and treatment regimen.

resultsAll groups demonstrated high mean EMA and medication adherence, with minor variations across treatment types. Importantly, patients showed improved adherence over time, independently of diagnosis or regimen. DISCUSSION: These findings indicate EMA's potential as an effective method for capturing medication adherence in psychiatric populations.

conclusionThe approach's capacity for real-time, context-sensitive data collection could reveal adherence patterns and changes not detectable by conventional methods, offering valuable insights for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Depressive DisorderEcological Momentary AssessmentMedication AdherencePrecision MedicineSchizophreniaSubstance-Related DisordersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmartphoneadherencedepressionEMAprecision psychiatryschizophreniaSUD

Identifiers

PMID39960195
PMCPMC12334975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.