ArticleJournal of anatomy
Palaeobiology and osteohistology of South African sauropodomorph dinosaurs.
Article in Journal of anatomy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A case report of a pathology in the 'whip' of a flagellicaudatan sauropod.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several sauropodomorph dinosaurs have been excavated from the Elliot Formation (EF) of Southern Africa which include important taxa such as Massospondylus, Melanorosaurus and Antetonitrus. The study of the bone microstructure of smaller, bipedal Sauropodomorpha and larger, quadrupedal Sauropoda allow us to infer how the growth dynamics changed during the evolution of gigantism. Historically, osteohistological studies of Sauropodomorpha tended to have focused on either early diverging taxa (e.g. Plateosaurus & Massospondylus) or on derived taxa (diplodocids & titanosaurs), whereas studies on the growth dynamics of the transitionary groups (i.e. Sauropodiformes & early Sauropoda) are poorly known. Here, we assess the palaeobiology of two sauropodiformes and an early sauropod by analysing their bone histology. Thin sections of the long bones of two indeterminate sauropodiformes NMQR 3314 and NMQR 1551, and an indeterminate sauropod SAM-PK-K382 were prepared. The general histology of the long bones of all three dinosaurs were similar. Rapid growth through the deposition of fibrolamellar bone tissue characterised their respective ontogenies. Lines of arrested growth (LAGs) were commonly located in the mid and outer cortex signalling the onset of uninterrupted growth. Differences in the histology of these dinosaurs were principally related to the pathological bone tissue evident in the femur of the sauropodiform NMQR 1551 and to the formation of annuli around LAGs in Sauropoda indet., as well as in the location of LAGs in the compacta. The number of LAGs in the cortex varied among the taxa but generally the outer regions of the cortex showed an accumulation of LAGs. The growth dynamics of our three sauropodomorph dinosaurs are similar to early sauropods such as Antetonitrus. It appears that the abundance of fibrolamellar bone tissue and uninterrupted growth at later ontogenetic stages are likely key traits in the early evolution of gigantism in Sauropoda, which supports the occurrence of a mosaic of growth dynamic patterns among transitionary Sauropodomorpha.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.