Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39960134›Full record

ReviewThe Laryngoscope2025

The Evolution of Multidisciplinary Head and Neck Cancer Treatment.

Kevin J Contrera, Pooja D Reddy, Vanessa Helou, Jeffrey N Myers, Heath D Skinner, Renata Ferrarotto, Eugene N Myers

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Role ofTranslational cancer research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cancer care coordination determinants of depression in head and neck cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kevin J ContreraDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2570-1706
Pooja D ReddyDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Vanessa HelouDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4826-1659
Jeffrey N MyersDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Heath D SkinnerHillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Renata FerrarottoDepartment of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Eugene N MyersDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has substantially changed over the past two centuries. This review explores the historical progression of HNSCC management focusing on the multidisciplinary treatment paradigm. DATA SOURCES: This review synthesizes data from historical and current clinical trials, books, scientific reports, public documents, and other written material relevant to HNSCC management. REVIEW

methodsHistorical review.

resultsAlthough surgery was initially the only treatment available, radiation, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy have expanded the treatment landscape for HNSCC. Despite continuous evolution, modern treatment of HNSCC remains rooted in a multidisciplinary, personalized approach. This review highlights the clinical pioneers who established the standards of care and the landmark trials that progressed it. The optimal timing, application, and extent of different treatments, including the role of neoadjuvant therapy, remain under study. Immunotherapy has improved outcomes for recurrent/metastatic mucosal HNSCC and cutaneous malignancies, although its role in the curative management of mucosal HNSCC is still materializing.

conclusionsSurgery and radiotherapy have made continued gains in reducing morbidity and treatment sequala. Platinum-based chemotherapy remains the mainstay of systemic therapy for HNSCC, but there has been accelerated growth in the application of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Comprehensive head and neck cancer care depends on multidisciplinary management, usually requiring multiple treatment modalities while individualizing both the therapies and treatment goals. Additional phase III trials are needed to further define the optimal treatments for HNSCC.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckCombined Modality TherapyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansImmunotherapychemotherapyhead and neck cancerhead and neck surgeryhistorical reviewimmunotherapylandmark trialsmultidisciplinary careradiotherapytreatment evolution

Identifiers

PMID39960134
PMCPMC12230886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.