Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39960058›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Statistical learning beyond words in human neonates.

Ana Fló, Lucas Benjamin, Marie Palu, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dynamics of the attentional blink in preverbal infants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana FlóCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CNRS ERL 9003, INSERM U992, CEA, Université Paris Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3260-0559
Lucas BenjaminCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CNRS ERL 9003, INSERM U992, CEA, Université Paris Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9578-6039
Marie PaluCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CNRS ERL 9003, INSERM U992, CEA, Université Paris Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Ghislaine Dehaene-LambertzCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CNRS ERL 9003, INSERM U992, CEA, Université Paris Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 695710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in statistical learning in developmental studies stems from the observation that 8-month-olds were able to extract words from a monotone speech stream solely using the transition probabilities (TP) between syllables (Saffran et al., 1996). A simple mechanism was thus part of the human infant's toolbox for discovering regularities in language. Since this seminal study, observations on statistical learning capabilities have multiplied across domains and species, challenging the hypothesis of a dedicated mechanism for language acquisition. Here, we leverage the two dimensions conveyed by speech -speaker identity and phonemes- to examine (1) whether neonates can compute TPs on one dimension despite irrelevant variation on the other and (2) whether the linguistic dimension enjoys an advantage over the voice dimension. In two experiments, we exposed neonates to artificial speech streams constructed by concatenating syllables while recording EEG. The sequence had a statistical structure based either on the phonetic content, while the voices varied randomly (Experiment 1) or on voices with random phonetic content (Experiment 2). After familiarisation, neonates heard isolated duplets adhering, or not, to the structure they were familiarised with. In both experiments, we observed neural entrainment at the frequency of the regularity and distinct Event-Related Potentials (ERP) to correct and incorrect duplets, highlighting the universality of statistical learning mechanisms and suggesting it operates on virtually any dimension the input is factorised. However, only linguistic duplets elicited a specific ERP component, potentially an N400 precursor, suggesting a lexical stage triggered by phonetic regularities already at birth. These results show that, from birth, multiple input regularities can be processed in parallel and feed different higher-order networks.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentLearningSpeech PerceptionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePhoneticsSpeechERPhumanlanguageneonatesneural entrainmentneurosciencespeechstatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID39960058
PMCPMC11832168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.