ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
The Efficacy of Thermal Mechanical Fractional Injury System for Facial Rejuvenation: Subjective, Objective and Image Analysis Study.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFacial aging is the result of a number of factors, including the resorption of skeletal tissue, the atrophy of fat pads, and the laxity of connective tissue. These factors contribute to a reduction in facial volume and the development of skin changes. Thermal mechanical fractional injury (TMFI) represents a minimally invasive solution, stimulating collagen production and enhancing the delivery of topical formulations via epidermal microcraters.
aimThis study seeks to evaluate the effects of TMFI on skin quality and introduce quantifiable methods to assess improvements. PATIENTS AND
methodsAdult patients seeking facial rejuvenation underwent three TMFI sessions, with a one-month interval between each session. The assessment of skin quality was conducted using the Scientific Assessment Scale of Skin Quality (SASSQ), which was completed by blinded experts. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using the FACEQ scale. Additionally, objective texture analysis was performed using the MAZDA program, which quantified surface irregularities.
resultsThe objective assessments demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the following parameters: roughness, wrinkles, pore size, elasticity, pigmentation, and erythema (p < 0.001). The FACE-Q results demonstrated high patient satisfaction, with a response rate of 68.4%. The MAZDA analysis confirmed significant texture improvements across most facial zones, with the exception of the medial forehead.
conclusionsThe findings of this study indicate that TMFI is an effective intervention for improving skin quality in a diverse range of patients. This study contributes to the existing literature on TMFI, which supports its use as a valuable tool in the field of skin rejuvenation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.