ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
A structural equation model predicts chronic wound healing time using patient characteristics and wound microbiome composition.
Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The dual role of the microbiome in chronic wound management.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Metagenomic profiling of the gut microbiome to predict orthopedic healing responses in postmenopausal women.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Immunomodulatory Mechanisms of Chronic Wound Healing: Translational and Clinical Relevance.MedComm · 2025Review
- A structural equation model predicts chronic wound healing time using patient characteristics and wound microbiome composition.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wound aetiology, host characteristics and the wound microbiome contribute to chronic wound development. Yet, there is little accounting for the relative importance of these factors to predict wound healing. Here, a structural equation model was developed to provide such an explanatory and predictive framework. Chronic wounds from 565 patients treated at a clinic practicing biofilm-based wound care were included. Patient information included DNA sequencing-based wound microbiome clinical reports corresponding to the initial clinical visit. Wound microbiome data was integrated into the SEM as a latent variable using a pre-modelling parcel optimization routine presented herein for the first time (available as R library parcelR). A microbiome latent construct associated with improved healing was validated, and the final SEM included this latent construct plus three species associated with diminished healing (Anaerococcus vaginalis, Finegoldia magna and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), as well as smoking, wound volume, slough, exudate, edema, percent granulation and wound etiology. This model explained 46% of variations in healing time, with the microbiome contributing the largest proportion of variance explained. Model validity was confirmed with an independent cohort (n = 79) through which ~60% of the variation in healing time was predicted. This model can serve as a foundation for the development of a predictive tool that may have clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.