Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959909›Full record

ReviewDiscovery immunology2025

The current landscape of optogenetics for the enhancement of adoptive T-cell therapy.

George R Smith, Max P Lee, Emma K Jennings, John R James

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discovery immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

George R SmithUniversity of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3130-2135
Max P LeeUniversity of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Emma K JenningsUniversity of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
John R JamesUniversity of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy, the medicinal modulation of a host's immune response to better combat a pathogen or disease, has transformed cancer treatments in recent decades. T-cells, an important component of the adaptive immune system, are further paramount for therapy success. Recent immunotherapeutic modalities have therefore more frequently targeted T-cells for cancer treatments and other pathologies and are termed adoptive T-cell (ATC) therapies. ATC therapies characterize various types of immunotherapies but predominantly fall into three established techniques: tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell, and engineered T-cell receptor therapies. Despite promising clinical results, all ATC therapy types fall short in providing long-term sustained tumour clearance while being particularly ineffective against solid tumours, with substantial developments aiming to understand and prevent the typical drawbacks of ATC therapy. Optogenetics is a relatively recent development, incorporating light-sensitive protein domains into cells or tissues of interest to optically tune specific biological processes. Optogenetic manipulation of immunological functions is rapidly becoming an investigative tool in immunology, with light-sensitive systems now being used to optimize many cellular therapeutic modalities and ATC therapies. This review focuses on how optogenetic approaches are currently utilized to improve ATC therapy in clinical settings by deepening our understanding of the molecular rationale behind therapy success. Moreover, this review further critiques current immuno-optogenetic systems and speculates on the expansion of recent developments, enhancing current ATC-based therapeutic modalities to pave the way for clinical progress.

Indexed as

adoptive T-cell therapycancerCAR-TeTCR-Timmunotherapyoptogeneticstumour-infiltrating lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID39959909
PMCPMC11829120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.