Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959891›Full record

ReviewMethodsX2024

A comprehensive overview of the fabrication and testing methods of FRP composite pipes.

Senthil Maharaj Kennedy, R B Jeen Robert, R Malkiya Rasalin Prince, G S Hikku, M Kaliraj

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Senthil Maharaj KennedyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, AAA College of Engineering and Technology, Sivakasi 626005, Tamil Nadu, India.
R B Jeen RobertDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Krishna College of Technology, Coimbatore 641042, Tamil Nadu, India.
R Malkiya Rasalin PrinceDivision of Mechanical Engineering, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore 641114, Tamil Nadu, India.
G S HikkuFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Chennai 603103, Tamil Nadu, India.
M KalirajDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, AAA College of Engineering and Technology, Sivakasi 626005, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current work offers a comprehensive and in-depth examination of Fiber Reinforced Composite pipes mainly dealing with Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) composite pipes, with a focus on fabrication techniques, testing methodologies, diverse applications across industries, challenges, limitations, and future developments. Because of their exceptional mechanical properties, corrosion resistance, and lightweight nature, CFRP composite pipes have received a lot of attention. It delves into the various CFRP composite pipe fabrication techniques, such as filament winding and pultrusion. The review delves deeply into the multifaceted landscape of testing and characterization methodologies for CFRP composite pipes. Mechanical testing, environmental assessments, and non-destructive evaluation techniques are investigated in order to better understand their roles in determining the structural integrity and performance of these pipes. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of CFRP composite pipes, bridging the gap between research and practical implementation. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers, engineers, and practitioners interested in the many facets of CFRP composite pipes and their profound impact on modern industries by synthesizing knowledge from fabrication to application.

Indexed as

CFRP compositeFabrication and Testing Methods of CFRP Composite PipesFilament windingMechanical characterizationNon-destructive testingPultrusion

Identifiers

PMID39959891
PMCPMC11829124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.