ArticleTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology
Safety and efficacy of travoprost intracameral implant administered in combination with cataract surgery.
Article in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06061718 (Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of iDose® TR), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of iDose® TR (Travoprost Intraocular Implant) in Conjunction With Cataract Surgery
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multimodal Approach to Open-Angle Glaucoma with Travoprost Intracameral Implant and Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery with or Without Concurrent Cataract Surgery.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Implants to Treat Glaucoma: Promising or Not?Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Early Real-World Safety and Short-Term Outcomes of Combined iStent Infinite and Intracameral Travoprost Implant (iDose TR) with or without Cataract Surgery.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The travoprost intracameral implant and cataract surgery both lower intraocular pressure (IOP). Objectives: We evaluated the safety and IOP-lowering effect at 3 months following administration of travoprost intracameral implant in combination with cataract surgery. Design: Prospective, 12-month, open-label, single-arm trial. Methods: We enrolled patients with age-related cataracts and open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in the same eye. At baseline, patients were required to have an unmedicated mean diurnal IOP (average of 8:00 am, 10:00 am, and 4:00 pm IOPs) of 24 mmHg or greater, and an IOP of 36 mmHg or less at each of these three timepoints. On the day of the combined procedure (day 1), patients who had uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery received a travoprost intracameral implant. Follow-up evaluations occurred on day 2-3, week 2, week 6, and month 3 visits. Results: Sixty patients had uncomplicated cataract surgery and received a travoprost intracameral implant. There were no serious adverse events. Study eye adverse events were reported in 8.3% of patients. The most frequently reported adverse event was dry eye (6.7%). At month 3, the mean diurnal IOP change from baseline was -10.6 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -11.2, -9.9; Conclusion: Administration of a travoprost intracameral implant combined with routine cataract surgery was safe. The sizable -10.6 mmHg IOP change from baseline at month 3 was both statistically significant and clinically relevant. Trial registration: NCT06061718, Travoprost Intraocular Implant in Conjunction with Cataract Surgery, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06061718.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.