Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959854›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology

Safety and efficacy of travoprost intracameral implant administered in combination with cataract surgery.

Inder Paul Singh, Lilit A Voskanyan, Kevin M Barber, James H Burden, LeAnne Connolly, L Jay Katz, Dale W Usner, Angela C Kothe, Tomas Navratil

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06061718 (Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of iDose® TR), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06061718 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of iDose® TR (Travoprost Intraocular Implant) in Conjunction With Cataract Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaukos CorporationRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsOpen Angle Glaucoma, Ocular HypertensionArmsiDose TR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Inder Paul SinghEye Center of Racine and Kenosha, Racine, WI, USA.
Lilit A VoskanyanOphthalmological Center After Malayan CJSC, Yerevan, Armenia.
Kevin M BarberCentral Florida Eye Specialists, DeLand, FL, USA.
James H BurdenSkyline Vision Clinic and Laser Center, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3418-2684
LeAnne ConnollyGlaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
L Jay KatzGlaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Dale W UsnerGlaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2799-0652
Angela C KotheGlaukos Corporation, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7971-5292
Tomas NavratilGlaukos Corporation, 1 Glaukos Way, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3577-3096

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The travoprost intracameral implant and cataract surgery both lower intraocular pressure (IOP). Objectives: We evaluated the safety and IOP-lowering effect at 3 months following administration of travoprost intracameral implant in combination with cataract surgery. Design: Prospective, 12-month, open-label, single-arm trial. Methods: We enrolled patients with age-related cataracts and open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in the same eye. At baseline, patients were required to have an unmedicated mean diurnal IOP (average of 8:00 am, 10:00 am, and 4:00 pm IOPs) of 24 mmHg or greater, and an IOP of 36 mmHg or less at each of these three timepoints. On the day of the combined procedure (day 1), patients who had uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery received a travoprost intracameral implant. Follow-up evaluations occurred on day 2-3, week 2, week 6, and month 3 visits. Results: Sixty patients had uncomplicated cataract surgery and received a travoprost intracameral implant. There were no serious adverse events. Study eye adverse events were reported in 8.3% of patients. The most frequently reported adverse event was dry eye (6.7%). At month 3, the mean diurnal IOP change from baseline was -10.6 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -11.2, -9.9; Conclusion: Administration of a travoprost intracameral implant combined with routine cataract surgery was safe. The sizable -10.6 mmHg IOP change from baseline at month 3 was both statistically significant and clinically relevant. Trial registration: NCT06061718, Travoprost Intraocular Implant in Conjunction with Cataract Surgery, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06061718.

Indexed as

iDose TRintraocular pressureocular drug delivery systemsocular hypertensionopen-angle glaucomaphacoemulsification

Identifiers

PMID39959854
PMCPMC11829291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.