Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959831›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

PGSXplorer: an integrated nextflow pipeline for comprehensive quality control and polygenic score model development.

Tutku Yaraş, Yavuz Oktay, Gökhan Karakülah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tutku Yaraşİzmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, İzmir, Turkey.
Yavuz Oktayİzmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0158-2693
Gökhan Karakülahİzmir Biomedicine and Genome Center, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6706-1375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of next-generation sequencing technologies and genomic data sharing initiatives during the post-Human Genome Project-era has catalyzed major advances in individualized medicine research. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have become a cornerstone of efforts towards understanding the genetic basis of complex diseases, leading to the development of polygenic scores (PGS). Despite their immense potential, the scarcity of standardized PGS development pipelines limits widespread adoption of PGS. Herein, we introduce PGSXplorer, a comprehensive Nextflow DSL2 pipeline that enables quality control of genomic data and automates the phasing, imputation, and construction of PGS models using reference GWAS data. PGSXplorer integrates various PGS development tools such as PLINK, PRSice-2, LD-Pred2, Lassosum2, MegaPRS, SBayesR-C, PRS-CSx and MUSSEL, improving the generalizability of PGS through multi-origin data integration. Tested with synthetic datasets, our fully Docker-encapsulated tool has demonstrated scalability and effectiveness for both single- and multi-population analyses. Continuously updated as an open-source tool, PGSXplorer is freely available with user tutorials at https://github.com/tutkuyaras/PGSXplorer, making it a valuable resource for advancing precision medicine in genetic research.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMultifactorial InheritanceSoftwareHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansQuality ControlGWASNextflowPGSPipelinePolygenic risk scorePolygenic scorePRSQuality control

Identifiers

PMID39959831
PMCPMC11829630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.