ArticleTanaffos2024
Factors Affecting the Medical Coding Errors of COVID-19 Hospital Records: A Cross-Sectional Study in East Iran.
Article in Tanaffos, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors associated with clinical coders' intention to use the international classification of diseases 11th revision (ICD-11): a cross-sectional study in Iran.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, disease coding significantly influenced national and international strategies for prevention, treatment, and control. This study aimed to assess the factors influencing COVID-19 records' coding errors in teaching hospitals in South Khorasan province. Materials and Methods: In 2022, researchers conducted a cross-sectional study in South Khorasan Province, Iran. Data was gathered using a self-developed questionnaire distributed among medical coders in all hospitals. Descriptive statistics were employed in the data analysis using SPSS version 19. Results: The study's results showed that non-observance of diagnostic principles by physicians (66 out of 92), a lack of specialized medical coding specialists (52 out of 92), and the use of ambiguous and non-standard abbreviations (51 out of 92) were the most significant factors affecting COVID-19 coding errors. Among the three main factors affecting COVID-19 records' coding errors, factors related to the medical coder (47.66 out of 92), factors related to healthcare providers (29.8 out of 92), and organizational and environmental factors (21.4 out of 92) were the most significant. Conclusion: This study revealed that multiple factors contribute to coding errors in COVID-19 records, with the most critical being physicians' non-adherence to diagnostic principles, the shortage of medical coding specialists, the use of unclear and non-standard abbreviations, and the absence of COVID-19 coding continuing education. Therefore, we recommend conducting workshops on diagnosis and coding for medical coders, particularly emphasizing the precise coding of COVID-19 records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39959802PMC11825067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.