ArticleHeliyon2024
Leveraging artificial neural networks for enhanced athlete performance evaluation through IMU data analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurosciences and Sports Rehabilitation in ACLR: A Narrative Review on Winning Alliance Strategies and Connecting the Dots.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Review
- Design and implementation of an intelligent sports management system (ISMS) using wireless sensor networks.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-03-03Author Unresponsive · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional methods of assessing athletes' physical fitness rely on standardized tests tailored to diverse demographics. However, emerging research suggests that supplementing quantitative assessments with qualitative analyses can significantly enhance decision-making processes. This study proposes an innovative approach that integrates artificial neural networks with wearable technology to overcome limitations in assessing the quality of sports tests. By utilizing Inertial Motion Units (IMUs), precise movement data during various tests are captured and computationally processed. This methodology not only facilitates the establishment of diverse criteria for qualitative athlete evaluation but also harnesses the power of neural networks to optimize analysis and decision-making. By examining data from these tests, the study has revealed insights into factors affecting athletes' performance trajectories, such as fatigue, endurance, and biomechanical efficiency. The results indicate significant improvements in the accuracy and depth of performance evaluation, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method. Additionally, the development and validation of novel metrics contribute to advancing sports science and performance analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.